It is important to also be aware of The ABA Rebuttal
It is undisputed that worldwide there is an obesity and type two diabetes mellitus (T2DM) epidemic and that both of these conditions contribute to chronic diseases like Metabolic Syndrome (MetSyn) all associated with increased morality. As discussed earlier there are those who agree and those who disagree that adding a small tax to sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) would have an impact on decreasing this epidemic.
In 2015, the Center for Disease (CDC) put out an obesity prevalence report stating 1:3 adults and 1:6 adolescents are considered obese. In 2008 the estimated obesity health related costs were $147 billion dollars. According to the CDC and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 28 million Americans are diagnosed with T2DM. In 2012 the estimated T2DM health related costs were $245 billion dollars.
Why focus on a small SSB tax?
The focus has been placed on adding a small tax to SSBs because 47% America’s added sugar comes from SSBs. The American Heart Association recommends a daily allowance of added sugar for women 6 tsp/day (25 grams/day) and a man 9 tsp/day (37.5 grams/day).
- One 12 oz. can of soda is 39 grams
- one fruit juice box is 30.6 grams
- one 20 oz. bottle of Gatorade is 34 grams.
In January 2017, Philadelphia instituted a 1.5 cent/oz tax on SSBs. The city’s revenue department, show preliminary SSB tax revenue results in first month was $5.7 million dollars and is expected to increase!
In Berkeley, California, a 1 cent/oz tax on SSBs brought in $116,000 dollars the first month. The SSB Products Panel of Experts Commission was established to manage and distribute the revenue. In 2014, the panel allocated $675,000 dollars towards public school health and wellness projects, intended to educate and encourage healthier eating habits by teaching children how to cook and garden. In addition, they are funding Berkeley YMCA’s Diabetes Prevention and Obesity programs as well as other health and wellness programs like the Healthy Black Families, Inc.
Briefly, it is clear that SSB tax policies have been established in several US cities. Philadelphia and Berkeley are publicly reporting their tax revenues and how they are distributing the money to support health and wellness programs. While the evidence is not yet substantial, the available information received to date are leading indicators that SSB taxes will in fact lead to a positive and significant reduction in healthcare costs by decreasing obesity and T2DM rates.
Aguilar, M., Bhuket, T., Torres, S., Liu, B., & Wong, R. J. (2015, May 19). Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the United States, 2003 – 2012. The Journal of American Medical Association, 313(19). http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.4260
American Diabetes Association. (2015). A1C and eAG. Retrieved from http://www.diabetes.org/living-with-diabetes/treatment-and-care/blood-glucose-control/a1c/
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). National diabetes statistics report, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/statsreport14/national-diabetes-report-web.pdf
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Adult obesity facts. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html
World Health Organization. (2015). WHO calls on countries to reduce sugars intake among adults and children. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2015/sugar-guideline/en/
There is technology that affects and interacts with all facets of our daily lives, including the foods and beverages that we consume. Technology impacts our consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) also. This blog entry will touch upon a few areas where technology can be used both positively and negatively in relation to our consumption of SSBs. Technology and information surrounds us, and a non-exclusive list of those technologies that will be discussed here includes mobile apps, social media, pod casts, cinema, the electronic transfer of funds, and the ever-present concern about privacy issues.
There are some mobile apps that calculate how many teaspoons of “added sugar” is found within a product. In North America, there is the “Sugar Rush” app. In the United Kingdom there is the “Change4Life”. And, in Australia there is “That Sugar App”.
These apps are easy to add to your smartphone or computer device. First, you download the app, then you need to register your name, email address, and sometime your zip code. Next, you “grant permission” so that the program can use your camera, etc. Now you are ready to scan the bar code of your selected product. If the manufacturer included the amount of added sugar in their bar code then the number of teaspoons of added sugar will appear. However, while these apps may be appealing they may not work and can be frustrating to use. For example, you may not get a number, so must be aware that many manufacturers have not started including added sugar are their nutrition labels.
Using these apps does present some privacy concerns. The Federal Trade Commission published an information sheet for mobile apps concerning privacy issues, access to our information, access to our camera, sharing our information, and collecting our personal data.
Recently, a hot topic has been “fake news”. The National Bureau of Economics reported that 14% of Americans considered social media the single most important source of information gathering for the 2016 election. A 2017 study investigated among healthcare providers which media platform was the used and responded to most frequently in regards to searching for continuing education hours. They compared email, Facebook, and Twitter, and found that the most effective social media platform was Facebook (p<0.001).
The public has easy access to numerous Facebook pages related to public health issues concerning SSB taxes, including: People against Sugar Tax, Metabolic Syndrome Peer Reviewed, American Beverage Association, American Diabetes Association, and other key stakeholders’ public pages.
Twitter, another popular social media platform, is accessible globally and is easy to use and find organizations and key stakeholders’ public interest feeds.
However, it is always important to be aware of privacy concerns whenever you surf the internet and click onto sites.
YouTube has numerous conferences/opinions from around the world, serving both opponents and proponents of positions.
Several movies have come on recently about added sugars, SSBs, and the impact on the obesity and T2DM epidemic. When “Super Size Me” came out years ago, it had a significant impact on the fast food industry. It seems likely that these sugar movies and documentaries my have similar significant impact.
Movies include: That Sugar Film and Fed Up.
SNAP and Electronic Funds Transfer
Technology affects all of us every day. It affects our consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB). The convenience of information is some what off set by the loss of personal information and other privacy concerns.
Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) Card Balance. (2017). Arizona EBT card balance. Retrieved from http://www.ebtcardbalance.com/arizona-ebt-card-balance-eb3
Federal Trade Commission. (2017, February). Understanding mobile apps [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0018-understanding-mobile-apps#privacy
Flynn, S., Hebert, P., Korenstein, D., Ryan, M., Jordan, W. B., & Keyhani, S. (2017). Leveraging socialmedia to promote evidence-based continuing medical education. Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168962
USA.gov. (2017). Online safety. Retrieved March 31, from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168962
The FDA’s proposal is to require that “added sugar” be included on nutrition labels. Here is the Sugar Associations rebuttal …